处理中…正在保护此关键操作,请稍候
模型短名单

适合大文档的长上下文模型 API

按窗口、价格、来源比较长上下文模型 API,并判断大上下文是否值得付。

这份候选名单适合什么用途: 长上下文模型

合同、导出、客服历史、大文件塞进提示词时,长上下文有用。账单也会跟着跳。窗口和输入单价一起看,并想清楚检索是不是比每次塞全文更便宜。

来源依据: NextModel 精选目录,以及可用时的 OpenRouter 上下文元数据。 · 更新日期 2026-07-01

步骤

如何使用这份名单(长上下文模型)

  1. 对照任务选模型 先看「长上下文模型」短名单是否覆盖你的真实任务,不要只比标价。
  2. 用同一批提示词试跑 挑 2–3 个候选,用业务提示词对比质量与输出长度。
  3. 估算月费 用价格页或成本计算器,按预计 token 量估算月度花费。
  4. 定兜底与预算 定主模型、兜底模型,设项目预算后再接生产流量。

上下文长度

推荐候选 长上下文模型

先从候选名单开始,再用真实提示词测试,并在接入生产路由前比较月度成本。

OpenAICatalog

GPT-5.4 is OpenAI’s latest frontier model, unifying the Codex and GPT lines into a single system. It features a 1M+ token context window (922K input, 128K output) with support for...

Starting at $2.50 / 1M tokensInput$15 / 1M tokensOutput1.1MContext
Best forimage understanding, multimodal chat
RoutingConfigured
StreamingTool callingJSON modeVisionLong context
Platform curatedNextModel gateway catalog (Go origin)
View details
OpenAICatalog

GPT-5.4 Pro is OpenAI's most advanced model, building on GPT-5.4's unified architecture with enhanced reasoning capabilities for complex, high-stakes tasks. It features a 1M+ token context window (922K input, 128K...

Starting at $30 / 1M tokensInput$180 / 1M tokensOutput1.1MContext
Best forimage understanding, multimodal chat
RoutingConfigured
StreamingTool callingJSON modeVisionLong context
Platform curatedNextModel gateway catalog (Go origin)
View details
OpenAICatalog

GPT-5.5 is OpenAI’s frontier model designed for complex professional workloads, building on GPT-5.4 with stronger reasoning, higher reliability, and improved token efficiency on hard tasks. It features a 1M+ token...

Starting at $5 / 1M tokensInput$30 / 1M tokensOutput1.1MContext
Best forimage understanding, multimodal chat
RoutingConfigured
StreamingTool callingJSON modeVisionLong context
Platform curatedNextModel gateway catalog (Go origin)
View details
OpenAICatalog

GPT-5.6 Luna is a fast, cost-efficient model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 series. It is suited for high-volume, latency-sensitive tasks such as chat, classification, and lightweight agentic workflows, providing capable reasoning for...

Starting at $0.2 / 1M tokensInput$1.20 / 1M tokensOutput1.1MContext
Best forimage understanding, multimodal chat
RoutingConfigured
StreamingTool callingJSON modeVisionLong context
Platform curatedNextModel gateway catalog (Go origin)
View details

比较表

按价格、提供方、上下文、能力和来源比较这份候选名单。

缩小生产候选、建立兜底策略或比较模型经济性时用。

ModelProviderInputOutputContextCapabilitiesBest forLatencyStatusSource
OpenAI: GPT-5.4openai/gpt-5.4OpenAIStarting at $2.50 / 1M tokens$15 / 1M tokens1.1M
StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision
image understanding, multimodal chat1000-3000msCatalogPlatform curated
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Proopenai/gpt-5.4-proOpenAIStarting at $30 / 1M tokens$180 / 1M tokens1.1M
StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision
image understanding, multimodal chat1000-3000msCatalogPlatform curated
OpenAI: GPT-5.5openai/gpt-5.5OpenAIStarting at $5 / 1M tokens$30 / 1M tokens1.1M
StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision
image understanding, multimodal chat1000-3000msCatalogPlatform curated
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Lunaopenai/gpt-5.6-lunaOpenAIStarting at $0.2 / 1M tokens$1.20 / 1M tokens1.1M
StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision
image understanding, multimodal chat1000-3000msCatalogPlatform curated
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Solopenai/gpt-5.6-solOpenAIStarting at $5 / 1M tokens$30 / 1M tokens1.1M
StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision
image understanding, multimodal chat1000-3000msCatalogPlatform curated
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terraopenai/gpt-5.6-terraOpenAIStarting at $2 / 1M tokens$12 / 1M tokens1.1M
StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision
image understanding, multimodal chat1000-3000msCatalogPlatform curated
Google: Gemini 2.5 Flashgoogle/gemini-2.5-flashGoogle$0.3 / 1M tokens$2.50 / 1M tokens1M
StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision
image understanding, multimodal chat1000-3000msCatalogPlatform curated
Google: Gemini 3 Flash Previewgoogle/gemini-3-flash-previewGoogle$0.5 / 1M tokens$3 / 1M tokens1M
StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision
image understanding, multimodal chat1000-3000msCatalogPlatform curated

常见问题

长上下文模型 常见问题

上下文窗口越大就一定越好吗?

不是。大窗口适合大输入;成本、延迟、检索设计和答案质量仍然决定值不值得。

什么时候该用检索而不是超大上下文?

当大部分文档与当前问题无关时。先抽相关片段,少塞上下文;质量够就用更小模型。

长上下文流量怎么估成本?

平均输入 token(含塞进的文档)乘输入单价,再加输出。长输入往往比想象中更吃账单。

相关

相关排行榜