Compare model APIs for agents that need tools, JSON mode, long context, and a budget you can live with.
Agent runs spit out a lot of tokens and burn money when tool loops go wrong. Before you wire one up, check tool calling, JSON reliability, context length, latency, and output price. Then set a budget so a bad loop cannot empty the account overnight.
Bronbasis: NextModel capability mapping and supported-parameter metadata when available. · Bijgewerkt 2026-07-01
Fit score
Begin met de shortlist, test daarna echte prompts en vergelijk de maandelijkse kosten voor productie-routing.
Gemini 4 Argon via NextModel: 1M-token context; $2 / 1M tokens in / $10 / 1M tokens out per 1M tokens. Capabilities: streaming, tool, json.
Claude Haiku 5.5 via NextModel: 1M-token context; Starting at $0.1 / 1M tokens in / $0.5 / 1M tokens out per 1M tokens. Capabilities: streaming, tool, json.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 via NextModel: 1M-token context; $2 / 1M tokens in / $10 / 1M tokens out per 1M tokens. Capabilities: streaming, tool, json.
GPT‑6 Luna via NextModel: 1M-token context; Starting at $0.1 / 1M tokens in / $0.5 / 1M tokens out per 1M tokens. Capabilities: streaming, tool, json.
Vergelijkingstabel
Gebruik dit overzicht om een productieshortlist te verkleinen, een fallbackbeleid op te bouwen of modeleconomie te vergelijken.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 4 Argongoogle/gemini-4-argon | $2 / 1M tokens | $10 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 2974-10589ms | Catalog | Platform curated | |
| Claude Haiku 5.5anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 | Anthropic | Starting at $0.1 / 1M tokens | $0.5 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1321-2017ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5 | Anthropic | $2 / 1M tokens | $10 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1230-2392ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| GPT‑6 Lunaopenai/gpt-6-luna | OpenAI | Starting at $0.1 / 1M tokens | $0.5 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1722-2681ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| GPT‑6 Solopenai/gpt-6-sol | OpenAI | Starting at $2 / 1M tokens | $10 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1752-3715ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Claude Opus 5.5anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 | Anthropic | $4 / 1M tokens | $20 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1845-5119ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| GPT-6 Astraopenai/gpt-6-astra | OpenAI | Starting at $10 / 1M tokens | $50 / 1M tokens | 1.1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 2408-7945ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Claude Fable 5.1anthropic/claude-fable-5.1 | Anthropic | $10 / 1M tokens | $50 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 3187-5152ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Tool calling, structured JSON, enough context for the task, and instructions that stick. Everything else is secondary.
They generate long traces: planning text, tool results stuffed back into context, and retries. Cap steps and log token use per run.
No. Route planning or simple tool picks to cheaper models when quality allows, and reserve stronger models for hard steps.
Rankings