Claude Fable 5 is a Mythos-class model from Anthropic, built for autonomous knowledge work and coding. It supports text, image, and file inputs with text output, with reasoning support and...
這份候選名單適合什麼用途?: Coding models
A model that completes a 20-line function is not the same product as a model that reads half a monorepo and calls tools. Output is expensive, tool calls fail in boring ways, and long context burns money. Use this page to pick a primary coding model and a cheaper fallback, then decide budget rules before agents run unsupervised.
來源依據: NextModel use-case taxonomy and OpenRouter supported-parameter metadata when available. · 更新日期 2026-07-01
如何使用这份名单
如何使用这份名单 (Coding models)
- 对照任务选模型. 先看「Coding models」短名单是否覆盖你的真实任务,不要只比标价。
- 用同一批提示词试跑. 挑 2–3 个候选,用业务提示词对比质量与输出长度。
- 估算月费. 用价格页或成本计算器,按预计 token 量估算月度花费。
- 定兜底与预算. 定主模型、兜底模型,设项目预算后再接生产流量。
匹配分
推薦候選 coding models
先從候選名單開始,再以真實提示詞測試,並在接入正式環境路由前比較月度成本。
Claude Haiku 4.5 is Anthropic’s fastest and most efficient model, delivering near-frontier intelligence at a fraction of the cost and latency of larger Claude models. Matching Claude Sonnet 4’s performance...
Claude Opus 4.5 is Anthropic’s frontier reasoning model optimized for complex software engineering, agentic workflows, and long-horizon computer use. It offers strong multimodal capabilities, competitive performance across real-world coding and...
Opus 4.6 is Anthropic’s strongest model for coding and long-running professional tasks. It is built for agents that operate across entire workflows rather than single prompts, making it especially effective...
比較表
按價格、提供者、上下文、能力與來源比較這份候選名單。
當你在縮小正式環境候選名單、建立備援策略或比較模型經濟性時,可使用此視圖。
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthropic: Claude Fable 5anthropic/claude-fable-5 | Anthropic | $1.45 / 1M tokens | $7.23 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 | Anthropic | $0.145 / 1M tokens | $0.723 / 1M tokens | 200k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5anthropic/claude-opus-4.5 | Anthropic | $0.723 / 1M tokens | $3.62 / 1M tokens | 200k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6anthropic/claude-opus-4.6 | Anthropic | $0.723 / 1M tokens | $3.62 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7anthropic/claude-opus-4.7 | Anthropic | $0.723 / 1M tokens | $3.62 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8anthropic/claude-opus-4.8 | Anthropic | $0.723 / 1M tokens | $3.62 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Claude Opus 5anthropic/claude-opus-5 | Anthropic | $0.723 / 1M tokens | $3.62 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5 | Anthropic | $0.434 / 1M tokens | $2.17 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
常見問題
Coding models 常見問題
What makes a model good for coding agents?
Reliable tool calling, structured output, enough context for the repo slice you send, and instructions it actually follows. Token price alone is a poor proxy.
How should teams control coding-agent cost?
Cap budgets per project, watch output tokens, and send simple tasks to cheaper models. Escalate only when quality checks fail.
相关排行榜