Compare Kimi-K2.6 (Moonshotai) and Kimi K3 (Moonshotai) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Lado a lado
Compare preço, fornecedor, contexto, capacidades, latência e base da fonte.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi-K2.6moonshotai/kimi-k2.6 | Moonshotai | $0.9 / 1M tokens | $3.72 / 1M tokens | 256k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 3705-7914ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Kimi K3moonshotai/kimi-k3 | Moonshotai | $2.95 / 1M tokens | $14.71 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1837-5615ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Kimi-K2.6 is cheaper ($0.9 / 1M tokens input / $3.72 / 1M tokens output) vs Kimi K3 ($2.95 / 1M tokens input / $14.71 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Kimi K3 is larger (1M tokens) vs 256k tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick Kimi-K2.6 to optimize cost, or Kimi K3 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.
Comparações relacionadas