Comparação de modelos

GLM-5.2 vs MiniMax M3

Compare GLM-5.2 (Zhipu AI (GLM)) and MiniMax M3 (MiniMax) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.

Qual deve escolher?

Price: MiniMax M3 is cheaper (¥2.81 / 1M tokens input / ¥11.23 / 1M tokens output) vs GLM-5.2 (¥8 / 1M tokens input / ¥28 / 1M tokens output).
GLM-5.2 adds: Reasoning.
MiniMax M3 adds: Low cost.

Lado a lado

GLM-5.2 vs MiniMax M3 — comparação completa

Compare preço, fornecedor, contexto, capacidades, latência e base da fonte.

Model	Provider	Input	Output	Context	Capabilities	Best for	Latency	Status	Source
GLM-5.2glm-5-2	Zhipu AI (GLM)	¥8 / 1M tokens	¥28 / 1M tokens	128k	Tool callingJSON modeStreamingReasoning	general-purpose reasoning, Chinese Q&A	1000-3000ms	Production	Platform curated
MiniMax M3minimax-m3	MiniMax	¥2.81 / 1M tokens	¥11.23 / 1M tokens	128k	Tool callingJSON modeStreamingLow cost	high-volume chat, agentic tool use	900-2800ms	Production	Platform curated

FAQ

GLM-5.2 vs MiniMax M3 FAQ

Is GLM-5.2 or MiniMax M3 cheaper?

MiniMax M3 is cheaper (¥2.81 / 1M tokens input / ¥11.23 / 1M tokens output) vs GLM-5.2 (¥8 / 1M tokens input / ¥28 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.

Which has a larger context window, GLM-5.2 or MiniMax M3?

Both offer the same context window: 128k tokens.

GLM-5.2 vs MiniMax M3 for Chinese: which should I pick?

Both target Chinese. Pick MiniMax M3 to optimize cost, or GLM-5.2 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.

Detalhes de GLM-5.2 Detalhes de MiniMax M3 Calculadora de preços Início rápido compatível com OpenAI