Compare DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (DeepSeek) and Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash (Qwen) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Lado a lado
Compare preço, fornecedor, contexto, capacidades, latência e base da fonte.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813 | DeepSeek | $1.33 / 1M tokens | $3.98 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeLong context | Chinese Q&A, general chat | 0-0ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flashqwen/qwen3.7-flash | Qwen | Starting at $0.03 / 1M tokens | $0.12 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 0-0ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper ($0.03 / 1M tokens input / $0.12 / 1M tokens output) vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 ($1.33 / 1M tokens input / $3.98 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is larger (1M tokens) vs 1M tokens.
Both target Long context. Pick Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash to optimize cost, or DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.