Compare Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) and Doubao Seedance 2.0 Fast (Doubao) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Lado a lado
Compare preço, fornecedor, contexto, capacidades, latência e base da fonte.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.5anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5 | Anthropic | $3 / 1M tokens | $15 / 1M tokens | 200k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1904-2753ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Doubao Seedance 2.0 Fastdoubao/doubao-seedance-2-0-fast-260128 | Doubao | $0.119 / s | — | — | StreamingVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 0-0ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Doubao Seedance 2.0 Fast is cheaper ($0.119 / s per second) vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 ($3 / 1M tokens input / $15 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is larger (200k tokens) vs — tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick Doubao Seedance 2.0 Fast to optimize cost, or Claude Sonnet 4.5 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.
Comparações relacionadas