Compare Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) and OpenAI: GPT-4.1 (OpenAI) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Lado a lado
Compare preço, fornecedor, contexto, capacidades, latência e base da fonte.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 | Anthropic | $1 / 1M tokens | $5 / 1M tokens | 200k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1510-2510ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| OpenAI: GPT-4.1openai/gpt-4.1 | OpenAI | $2 / 1M tokens | $8 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1364-2415ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper ($1 / 1M tokens input / $5 / 1M tokens output) vs OpenAI: GPT-4.1 ($2 / 1M tokens input / $8 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
OpenAI: GPT-4.1 is larger (1M tokens) vs 200k tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 to optimize cost, or OpenAI: GPT-4.1 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.
Comparações relacionadas