Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (Google) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Lado a lado
Compare preco, provedor, contexto, capacidades, latencia e base da fonte.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 | Anthropic | $1 / 1M tokens | $5 / 1M tokens | 200k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1327-2183ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash-Litegoogle/gemini-3.1-flash-lite | $0.25 / 1M tokens | $1.50 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 936-1952ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is cheaper ($0.25 / 1M tokens input / $1.50 / 1M tokens output) vs Claude Haiku 4.5 ($1 / 1M tokens input / $5 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is larger (1M tokens) vs 200k tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite to optimize cost, or Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.