Compare Z.ai: GLM 4.6V (OpenRouter) and Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest (OpenRouter) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Cote a cote
Comparez le prix, le fournisseur, le contexte, les capacites, la latence et la base de source.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Z.ai: GLM 4.6Vz-ai/glm-4.6v | OpenRouter | $0.058 / 1M tokens | $0.169 / 1M tokens | 131.1k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest~anthropic/claude-opus-latest | OpenRouter | $0.94 / 1M tokens | $4.70 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Z.ai: GLM 4.6V is cheaper ($0.058 / 1M tokens input / $0.169 / 1M tokens output) vs Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest ($0.94 / 1M tokens input / $4.70 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest is larger (1M tokens) vs 131.1k tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick Z.ai: GLM 4.6V to optimize cost, or Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.