Compare GPT-4o-mini (OpenAI) and GPT-5.1 Codex Mini (OpenAI) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Cote a cote
Comparez le prix, le fournisseur, le contexte, les capacites, la latence et la base de source.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-4o-miniopenai/gpt-4o-mini | OpenAI | $0.15 / 1M tokens | $0.6 / 1M tokens | 128k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1160-2104ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| GPT-5.1 Codex Miniopenai/gpt-5.1-codex-mini | OpenAI | $0.25 / 1M tokens | $2 / 1M tokens | 400k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1741-5672ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
GPT-4o-mini is cheaper ($0.15 / 1M tokens input / $0.6 / 1M tokens output) vs GPT-5.1 Codex Mini ($0.25 / 1M tokens input / $2 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
GPT-5.1 Codex Mini is larger (400k tokens) vs 128k tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick GPT-4o-mini to optimize cost, or GPT-5.1 Codex Mini for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.