Compare Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google) and GLM 5.3 (Z Ai) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Cote a cote
Comparez le prix, le fournisseur, le contexte, les capacites, la latence et la base de source.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.7 Flashgoogle/gemini-3.7-flash | $1.50 / 1M tokens | $7.50 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 2092-2835ms | Catalog | Platform curated | |
| GLM 5.3z-ai/glm-5.3 | Z Ai | $1.40 / 1M tokens | $4.40 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeLong context | General chat via Z Ai, API workloads | 5533-10057ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
GLM 5.3 is cheaper ($1.40 / 1M tokens input / $4.40 / 1M tokens output) vs Gemini 3.7 Flash ($1.50 / 1M tokens input / $7.50 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Both offer the same context window: 1M tokens.
Both target Long context. Pick GLM 5.3 to optimize cost, or Gemini 3.7 Flash for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.
Comparaisons liees