Compare Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (Google) and Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Cote a cote
Comparez le prix, le fournisseur, le contexte, les capacites, la latence et la base de source.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Litegoogle/gemini-3.1-flash-lite | $0.25 / 1M tokens | $1.50 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1150-5185ms | Catalog | Platform curated | |
| Google: Gemini 3.7 Flashgoogle/gemini-3.7-flash | $1.50 / 1M tokens | $7.50 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 0-0ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper ($0.25 / 1M tokens input / $1.50 / 1M tokens output) vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash ($1.50 / 1M tokens input / $7.50 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Both offer the same context window: 1M tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite to optimize cost, or Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.