Compare Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) and OpenAI: GPT-4o-mini (OpenRouter) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Cote a cote
Comparez le prix, le fournisseur, le contexte, les capacites, la latence et la base de source.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5 | Anthropic | $3 / 1M tokens | $15 / 1M tokens | 1M | Tool callingJSON modeLong contextReasoning | coding agents, code review | 1600-4800ms | Catalog | OpenRouter if available |
| OpenAI: GPT-4o-miniopenai/gpt-4o-mini | OpenRouter | $0.15 / 1M tokens | $0.6 / 1M tokens | 128k | Tool callingVisionJSON modeLong context | low-cost chat, image understanding | 800-2400ms | Catalog | OpenRouter if available |
FAQ
OpenAI: GPT-4o-mini is cheaper ($0.15 / 1M tokens input / $0.6 / 1M tokens output) vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 ($3 / 1M tokens input / $15 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 is larger (1M tokens) vs 128k tokens.
Both target Agent. Pick OpenAI: GPT-4o-mini to optimize cost, or Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.