Compare Claude Haiku 5.5 (Anthropic) and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (Google) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Cote a cote
Comparez le prix, le fournisseur, le contexte, les capacites, la latence et la base de source.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 | Anthropic | Starting at $0.1 / 1M tokens | $0.5 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1321-2017ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash-Litegoogle/gemini-3.1-flash-lite | $0.25 / 1M tokens | $1.50 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 936-1952ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper ($0.1 / 1M tokens input / $0.5 / 1M tokens output) vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite ($0.25 / 1M tokens input / $1.50 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Both offer the same context window: 1M tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 to optimize cost, or Claude Haiku 5.5 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.