Compare Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic) and Claude Opus 4.6 Fast (Anthropic) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Cote a cote
Comparez le prix, le fournisseur, le contexte, les capacites, la latence et la base de source.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude 3.5 Haikuanthropic/claude-3.5-haiku | Anthropic | $0.152 / 1M tokens | $0.752 / 1M tokens | — | Streaming | General chat via Anthropic, API workloads | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Claude Opus 4.6 Fastanthropic/claude-opus-4.6-fast | Anthropic | $5.64 / 1M tokens | $28.21 / 1M tokens | — | Streaming | General chat via Anthropic, API workloads | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Claude 3.5 Haiku is cheaper ($0.152 / 1M tokens input / $0.752 / 1M tokens output) vs Claude Opus 4.6 Fast ($5.64 / 1M tokens input / $28.21 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Both offer the same context window: — tokens.
Both target High quality. Pick Claude 3.5 Haiku to optimize cost, or Claude 3.5 Haiku for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.