Gemini 4 Argon via NextModel: 1M-token context; $2 / 1M tokens in / $10 / 1M tokens out per 1M tokens. Capabilities: streaming, tool, json.
Best agent model APIs for tool-calling workflows
Compare model APIs for agents that need tools, JSON mode, long context, and a budget you can live with.
Σε τι χρησιμεύει αυτή η σύντομη λίστα;: Agent models
Agent runs spit out a lot of tokens and burn money when tool loops go wrong. Before you wire one up, check tool calling, JSON reliability, context length, latency, and output price. Then set a budget so a bad loop cannot empty the account overnight.
Βάση πηγής: NextModel capability mapping and supported-parameter metadata when available. · Ενημερώθηκε 2026-07-01
Fit score
Προτεινόμενοι υποψήφιοι agent models
Ξεκινήστε από τη σύντομη λίστα, δοκιμάστε πραγματικά prompt και συγκρίνετε το μηνιαίο κόστος πριν από τη δρομολόγηση στην παραγωγή.
Claude Haiku 5.5 via NextModel: 1M-token context; Starting at $0.1 / 1M tokens in / $0.5 / 1M tokens out per 1M tokens. Capabilities: streaming, tool, json.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 via NextModel: 1M-token context; $2 / 1M tokens in / $10 / 1M tokens out per 1M tokens. Capabilities: streaming, tool, json.
GPT‑6 LunaNew
GPT‑6 Luna via NextModel: 1M-token context; Starting at $0.1 / 1M tokens in / $0.5 / 1M tokens out per 1M tokens. Capabilities: streaming, tool, json.
Πίνακας σύγκρισης
Συγκρίνετε τη λίστα ανά τιμή, πάροχο, πλαίσιο, δυνατότητες και πηγή.
Χρησιμοποιήστε αυτή την προβολή όταν περιορίζετε τη λίστα για παραγωγή, χτίζετε εφεδρική πολιτική ή συγκρίνετε την οικονομία των μοντέλων.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 4 Argongoogle/gemini-4-argon | $2 / 1M tokens | $10 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 2974-10589ms | Catalog | Platform curated | |
| Claude Haiku 5.5anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 | Anthropic | Starting at $0.1 / 1M tokens | $0.5 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1321-2017ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5 | Anthropic | $2 / 1M tokens | $10 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1230-2392ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| GPT‑6 Lunaopenai/gpt-6-luna | OpenAI | Starting at $0.1 / 1M tokens | $0.5 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1722-2681ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| GPT‑6 Solopenai/gpt-6-sol | OpenAI | Starting at $2 / 1M tokens | $10 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1752-3715ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Claude Opus 5.5anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 | Anthropic | $4 / 1M tokens | $20 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1845-5119ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| GPT-6 Astraopenai/gpt-6-astra | OpenAI | Starting at $10 / 1M tokens | $50 / 1M tokens | 1.1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 2408-7945ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Claude Fable 5.1anthropic/claude-fable-5.1 | Anthropic | $10 / 1M tokens | $50 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 3187-5152ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Agent models FAQ
Which capabilities matter most for agent models?
Tool calling, structured JSON, enough context for the task, and instructions that stick. Everything else is secondary.
Why do agent workflows get expensive so fast?
They generate long traces: planning text, tool results stuffed back into context, and retries. Cap steps and log token use per run.
Should agents always use the strongest model?
No. Route planning or simple tool picks to cheaper models when quality allows, and reserve stronger models for hard steps.
Κατατάξεις