Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) and Grok 4.6 (X Ai) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Seite an Seite
Vergleichen Sie Preis, Anbieter, Kontext, Fahigkeiten, Latenz und Quellenbasis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 | Anthropic | $1 / 1M tokens | $5 / 1M tokens | 200k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1265-12374ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Grok 4.6x-ai/grok-4.6 | X Ai | Starting at $2 / 1M tokens | $6 / 1M tokens | 500k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 0-0ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper ($1 / 1M tokens input / $5 / 1M tokens output) vs Grok 4.6 ($2 / 1M tokens input / $6 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Grok 4.6 is larger (500k tokens) vs 200k tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick Claude Haiku 4.5 to optimize cost, or Grok 4.6 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.
Verwandte Vergleiche