Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) and DeepSeek-V4-Flash (DeepSeek) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Seite an Seite
Vergleichen Sie Preis, Anbieter, Kontext, Fahigkeiten, Latenz und Quellenbasis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 | Anthropic | $1 / 1M tokens | $5 / 1M tokens | 200k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1166-3573ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| DeepSeek-V4-Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash | DeepSeek | $0.14 / 1M tokens | $0.28 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeLong context | Chinese Q&A, general chat | 1679-6515ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
DeepSeek-V4-Flash is cheaper ($0.14 / 1M tokens input / $0.28 / 1M tokens output) vs Claude Haiku 4.5 ($1 / 1M tokens input / $5 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash is larger (1M tokens) vs 200k tokens.
Both target Long context. Pick DeepSeek-V4-Flash to optimize cost, or DeepSeek-V4-Flash for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.
Verwandte Vergleiche