Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) and Kimi-K2.6 (Moonshotai) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Seite an Seite
Vergleichen Sie Preis, Anbieter, Kontext, Fahigkeiten, Latenz und Quellenbasis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 | Anthropic | $1 / 1M tokens | $5 / 1M tokens | 200k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1166-3573ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Kimi-K2.6moonshotai/kimi-k2.6 | Moonshotai | $0.9 / 1M tokens | $3.72 / 1M tokens | 256k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1429-4238ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Kimi-K2.6 is cheaper ($0.9 / 1M tokens input / $3.72 / 1M tokens output) vs Claude Haiku 4.5 ($1 / 1M tokens input / $5 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Kimi-K2.6 is larger (256k tokens) vs 200k tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick Kimi-K2.6 to optimize cost, or Kimi-K2.6 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.
Verwandte Vergleiche