Porovnejte Z.ai: GLM 4.5 Air (OpenRouter) a Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest (OpenRouter) podle ceny, kontextu, schopnosti a latence.
Vedle sebe
Porovnejte cenu, poskytovatele, kontext, schopnosti, latenci a zdrojovy zaklad.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Z.ai: GLM 4.5 Airz-ai/glm-4.5-air | OpenRouter | $0.025 / 1M tokens | $0.161 / 1M tokens | 131.1k | StreamingTool callingLong context | General chat via OpenRouter, API workloads | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest~anthropic/claude-haiku-latest | OpenRouter | $0.188 / 1M tokens | $0.94 / 1M tokens | 200k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Z.ai: GLM 4.5 Air je levnejsi ($0.025 / 1M tokens input / $0.161 / 1M tokens output) nez Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest ($0.188 / 1M tokens input / $0.94 / 1M tokens output). Skutecne naklady zaviseji na pomeru vstupnich a vystupnich tokenu, proto je odhadnete cenovou kalkulackou na zaklade realneho provozu.
Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest ma vetsi kontextove okno (200k tokenu) oproti 131.1k tokenum.
Oba modely se hodi pro Long context. Zvolte Z.ai: GLM 4.5 Air, pokud je prioritou cena, nebo Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest, pokud potrebujete vetsi kontextove okno. Otestujte oba na realnych promptech pred smerovanim produkcniho provozu.