Porovnejte StepFun: Step 3.5 Flash (OpenRouter) a Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest (OpenRouter) podle ceny, kontextu, schopnosti a latence.
Vedle sebe
Porovnejte cenu, poskytovatele, kontext, schopnosti, latenci a zdrojovy zaklad.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| StepFun: Step 3.5 Flashstepfun/step-3.5-flash | OpenRouter | $0.017 / 1M tokens | $0.058 / 1M tokens | 262.1k | StreamingTool callingLong context | General chat via OpenRouter, API workloads | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest~anthropic/claude-opus-latest | OpenRouter | $0.94 / 1M tokens | $4.70 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
StepFun: Step 3.5 Flash je levnejsi ($0.017 / 1M tokens input / $0.058 / 1M tokens output) nez Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest ($0.94 / 1M tokens input / $4.70 / 1M tokens output). Skutecne naklady zaviseji na pomeru vstupnich a vystupnich tokenu, proto je odhadnete cenovou kalkulackou na zaklade realneho provozu.
Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest ma vetsi kontextove okno (1M tokenu) oproti 262.1k tokenum.
Oba modely se hodi pro Long context. Zvolte StepFun: Step 3.5 Flash, pokud je prioritou cena, nebo Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest, pokud potrebujete vetsi kontextove okno. Otestujte oba na realnych promptech pred smerovanim produkcniho provozu.