Porovnejte Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) (Google) a Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) (Google) podle ceny, kontextu, schopnosti a latence.
Vedle sebe
Porovnejte cenu, poskytovatele, kontext, schopnosti, latenci a zdrojovy zaklad.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)google/gemini-2.5-flash-image | $0.058 / 1M tokens | $0.47 / 1M tokens | 32.8k | StreamingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated | |
| Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)google/gemini-3.1-flash-image-preview | $0.094 / 1M tokens | $0.564 / 1M tokens | 65.5k | StreamingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) je levnejsi ($0.058 / 1M tokens input / $0.47 / 1M tokens output) nez Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) ($0.094 / 1M tokens input / $0.564 / 1M tokens output). Skutecne naklady zaviseji na pomeru vstupnich a vystupnich tokenu, proto je odhadnete cenovou kalkulackou na zaklade realneho provozu.
Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) ma vetsi kontextove okno (65.5k tokenu) oproti 32.8k tokenum.
Oba modely se hodi pro Vision. Zvolte Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image), pokud je prioritou cena, nebo Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview), pokud potrebujete vetsi kontextove okno. Otestujte oba na realnych promptech pred smerovanim produkcniho provozu.