Porovnejte Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) a DeepSeek V4 Pro (DeepSeek) podle ceny, kontextu, schopnosti a latence.
Vedle sebe
Porovnejte cenu, poskytovatele, kontext, schopnosti, latenci a zdrojovy zaklad.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5 | Anthropic | $3 / 1M tokens | $15 / 1M tokens | 1M | Tool callingJSON modeLong contextReasoning | coding agents, code review | 1600-4800ms | Catalog | OpenRouter if available |
| DeepSeek V4 Prodeepseek-v4-pro | DeepSeek | ¥12 / 1M tokens | ¥24 / 1M tokens | 128k | Tool callingJSON modeStreamingReasoning | complex reasoning, agentic coding | 1100-3400ms | Production | Platform curated |
FAQ
DeepSeek V4 Pro je levnejsi (¥12 / 1M tokens input / ¥24 / 1M tokens output) nez Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 ($3 / 1M tokens input / $15 / 1M tokens output). Skutecne naklady zaviseji na pomeru vstupnich a vystupnich tokenu, proto je odhadnete cenovou kalkulackou na zaklade realneho provozu.
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 ma vetsi kontextove okno (1M tokenu) oproti 128k tokenum.
Oba modely se hodi pro Agent. Zvolte DeepSeek V4 Pro, pokud je prioritou cena, nebo Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5, pokud potrebujete vetsi kontextove okno. Otestujte oba na realnych promptech pred smerovanim produkcniho provozu.