Porovnejte Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) a DeepSeek: R1 (DeepSeek) podle ceny, kontextu, schopnosti a latence.
Vedle sebe
Porovnejte cenu, poskytovatele, kontext, schopnosti, latenci a zdrojovy zaklad.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5 | Anthropic | $3 / 1M tokens | $15 / 1M tokens | 1M | Tool callingJSON modeLong contextReasoning | coding agents, code review | 1600-4800ms | Catalog | OpenRouter if available |
| DeepSeek: R1deepseek/deepseek-r1 | DeepSeek | $0.7 / 1M tokens | $2.50 / 1M tokens | 163.8k | JSON modeLong contextReasoningStreaming | Chinese reasoning, math | 1800-6000ms | Catalog | OpenRouter if available |
FAQ
DeepSeek: R1 je levnejsi ($0.7 / 1M tokens input / $2.50 / 1M tokens output) nez Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 ($3 / 1M tokens input / $15 / 1M tokens output). Skutecne naklady zaviseji na pomeru vstupnich a vystupnich tokenu, proto je odhadnete cenovou kalkulackou na zaklade realneho provozu.
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 ma vetsi kontextove okno (1M tokenu) oproti 163.8k tokenum.
Oba modely se hodi pro Coding. Zvolte DeepSeek: R1, pokud je prioritou cena, nebo Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5, pokud potrebujete vetsi kontextove okno. Otestujte oba na realnych promptech pred smerovanim produkcniho provozu.
Souvisejici srovnani