Porovnejte Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1 (Anthropic) a Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) (Anthropic) podle ceny, kontextu, schopnosti a latence.
Vedle sebe
Porovnejte cenu, poskytovatele, kontext, schopnosti, latenci a zdrojovy zaklad.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1anthropic/claude-opus-4.1 | Anthropic | $2.82 / 1M tokens | $14.11 / 1M tokens | 200k | StreamingTool callingVisionLong context | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast)anthropic/claude-opus-4.7-fast | Anthropic | $5.64 / 1M tokens | $28.21 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1 je levnejsi ($2.82 / 1M tokens input / $14.11 / 1M tokens output) nez Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) ($5.64 / 1M tokens input / $28.21 / 1M tokens output). Skutecne naklady zaviseji na pomeru vstupnich a vystupnich tokenu, proto je odhadnete cenovou kalkulackou na zaklade realneho provozu.
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) ma vetsi kontextove okno (1M tokenu) oproti 200k tokenum.
Oba modely se hodi pro Vision. Zvolte Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1, pokud je prioritou cena, nebo Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast), pokud potrebujete vetsi kontextove okno. Otestujte oba na realnych promptech pred smerovanim produkcniho provozu.