Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) (Google) ile Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) (Google) modellerini fiyat, baglam, yetenekler ve gecikme acisindan karsilastirin.
Yan yana
Fiyat, saglayici, baglam, yetenekler, gecikme ve kaynak temelini karsilastirin.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)google/gemini-2.5-flash-image | $0.058 / 1M tokens | $0.47 / 1M tokens | 32.8k | StreamingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated | |
| Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)google/gemini-3.1-flash-image-preview | $0.094 / 1M tokens | $0.564 / 1M tokens | 65.5k | StreamingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image), Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) modeline gore daha ucuzdur ($0.058 / 1M tokens input / $0.47 / 1M tokens output vs $0.094 / 1M tokens input / $0.564 / 1M tokens output). Gercek maliyet, giris ve cikis token karisiminiza baglidir; bu nedenle fiyat hesaplayici ile gercek trafik uzerinden tahmin yapin.
Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) daha buyuk baglam penceresine sahiptir (65.5k token), digeri ise 32.8k token sunar.
Her iki model de Vision icin uygundur. Maliyet oncelikliyse Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image), daha genis baglam gerekiyorsa Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) secin. Uretim trafigini yonlendirmeden once ikisini de gercek promptlarla test edin.