Compara Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic) si Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) dupa pret, context, capabilitati si latenta.
Unul langa altul
Compara pretul, furnizorul, contextul, capabilitatile, latenta si baza sursei.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7anthropic/claude-opus-4.7 | Anthropic | $5 / 1M tokens | $25 / 1M tokens | 1M | Tool callingJSON modeLong contextReasoning | frontier reasoning, large codebase review | 2300-6800ms | Catalog | OpenRouter if available |
| Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5 | Anthropic | $3 / 1M tokens | $15 / 1M tokens | 1M | Tool callingJSON modeLong contextReasoning | coding agents, code review | 1600-4800ms | Catalog | OpenRouter if available |
FAQ
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 este mai ieftin ($3 / 1M tokens input / $15 / 1M tokens output) decat Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 ($5 / 1M tokens input / $25 / 1M tokens output). Costul real depinde de raportul dintre tokenii de intrare si iesire, asa ca merita sa-l estimezi cu calculatorul de pret pe baza traficului real.
Ambele modele ofera aceeasi fereastra de context: 1M tokeni.
Ambele modele sunt potrivite pentru High quality. Alege Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 daca prioritatea este costul, sau Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 daca ai nevoie de o fereastra de context mai mare. Testeaza-le pe ambele pe prompturi reale inainte sa trimiti trafic de productie.