Compara Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) si DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash (DeepSeek) dupa pret, context, capabilitati si latenta.
Unul langa altul
Compara pretul, furnizorul, contextul, capabilitatile, latenta si baza sursei.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 | Anthropic | $1 / 1M tokens | $5 / 1M tokens | 200k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1327-2183ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| DeepSeek-V4.1-Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-1-flash | DeepSeek | $0.3 / 1M tokens | $1.18 / 1M tokens | 1M | Streaming | Chinese Q&A, general chat | 4553-6187ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash este mai ieftin ($0.3 / 1M tokens input / $1.18 / 1M tokens output) decat Claude Haiku 4.5 ($1 / 1M tokens input / $5 / 1M tokens output). Costul real depinde de raportul dintre tokenii de intrare si iesire, asa ca merita sa-l estimezi cu calculatorul de pret pe baza traficului real.
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash are fereastra de context mai mare (1M tokeni) fata de 200k tokeni.