Compare GPT-4.1 Mini (OpenAI) and GPT‑6 Luna (OpenAI) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Lado a lado
Compara precio, proveedor, contexto, capacidades, latencia y base de la fuente.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-4.1 Miniopenai/gpt-4.1-mini | OpenAI | $0.4 / 1M tokens | $1.60 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1371-2765ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| GPT‑6 Lunaopenai/gpt-6-luna | OpenAI | Starting at $0.1 / 1M tokens | $0.5 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1722-2681ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
GPT‑6 Luna is cheaper ($0.1 / 1M tokens input / $0.5 / 1M tokens output) vs GPT-4.1 Mini ($0.4 / 1M tokens input / $1.60 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Both offer the same context window: 1M tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick GPT‑6 Luna to optimize cost, or GPT-4.1 Mini for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.