Compare Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 (Anthropic) and OpenAI: GPT-4o-mini (OpenAI) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Lado a lado
Compara precio, proveedor, contexto, capacidades, latencia y base de la fuente.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5anthropic/claude-opus-4.5 | Anthropic | $5 / 1M tokens | $25 / 1M tokens | 200k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1867-2824ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| OpenAI: GPT-4o-miniopenai/gpt-4o-mini | OpenAI | $0.15 / 1M tokens | $0.6 / 1M tokens | 128k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1647-2808ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
OpenAI: GPT-4o-mini is cheaper ($0.15 / 1M tokens input / $0.6 / 1M tokens output) vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 ($5 / 1M tokens input / $25 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 is larger (200k tokens) vs 128k tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick OpenAI: GPT-4o-mini to optimize cost, or Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.
Comparaciones relacionadas