Compare DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 (DeepSeek) and Deepseek V4 Flash (DeepSeek) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Lado a lado
Compara precio, proveedor, contexto, capacidades, latencia y base de la fuente.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3.1 | DeepSeek | $0.041 / 1M tokens | $0.149 / 1M tokens | 163.8k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeLong context | Chinese Q&A, general chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Deepseek V4 Flashdeepseek-v4-flash | DeepSeek | $0 / 1M tokens | $0 / 1M tokens | — | Streaming | Chinese Q&A, general chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Deepseek V4 Flash is cheaper ($0 / 1M tokens input / $0 / 1M tokens output) vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 ($0.041 / 1M tokens input / $0.149 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 is larger (163.8k tokens) vs — tokens.
Both target Chinese. Pick Deepseek V4 Flash to optimize cost, or DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.
Comparaciones relacionadas