Compare Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 (Anthropic) and OpenAI: GPT-5 Pro (OpenAI) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Lado a lado
Compara precio, proveedor, contexto, capacidades, latencia y base de la fuente.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5anthropic/claude-opus-4.5 | Anthropic | $5 / 1M tokens | $25 / 1M tokens | 200k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1949-2824ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| OpenAI: GPT-5 Proopenai/gpt-5-pro | OpenAI | $15 / 1M tokens | $120 / 1M tokens | 400k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 13125-21589ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 is cheaper ($5 / 1M tokens input / $25 / 1M tokens output) vs OpenAI: GPT-5 Pro ($15 / 1M tokens input / $120 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
OpenAI: GPT-5 Pro is larger (400k tokens) vs 200k tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 to optimize cost, or OpenAI: GPT-5 Pro for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.
Comparaciones relacionadas