Compare Anthropic: Claude 3 Haiku (Anthropic) and Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 (Anthropic) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Lado a lado
Compara precio, proveedor, contexto, capacidades, latencia y base de la fuente.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthropic: Claude 3 Haikuanthropic/claude-3-haiku | Anthropic | $0.048 / 1M tokens | $0.236 / 1M tokens | 200k | StreamingTool callingVisionLong context | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Anthropic: Claude Opus 4anthropic/claude-opus-4 | Anthropic | $2.82 / 1M tokens | $14.11 / 1M tokens | 200k | StreamingTool callingVisionLong context | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Anthropic: Claude 3 Haiku is cheaper ($0.048 / 1M tokens input / $0.236 / 1M tokens output) vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4 ($2.82 / 1M tokens input / $14.11 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Both offer the same context window: 200k tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick Anthropic: Claude 3 Haiku to optimize cost, or Anthropic: Claude 3 Haiku for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.