Compare model APIs for agents that need tools, JSON mode, long context, and a budget you can live with.
Agent runs spit out a lot of tokens and burn money when tool loops go wrong. Before you wire one up, check tool calling, JSON reliability, context length, latency, and output price. Then set a budget so a bad loop cannot empty the account overnight.
Base de la fuente: NextModel capability mapping and supported-parameter metadata when available. · Actualizado 2026-07-01
Fit score
Empieza con la lista corta, prueba prompts reales y compara el costo mensual antes del routing en produccion.
Gemini 4 Argon via NextModel: 1M-token context; $2 / 1M tokens in / $10 / 1M tokens out per 1M tokens. Capabilities: streaming, tool, json.
Claude Haiku 5.5 via NextModel: 1M-token context; Starting at $0.1 / 1M tokens in / $0.5 / 1M tokens out per 1M tokens. Capabilities: streaming, tool, json.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 via NextModel: 1M-token context; $2 / 1M tokens in / $10 / 1M tokens out per 1M tokens. Capabilities: streaming, tool, json.
GPT‑6 Luna via NextModel: 1M-token context; Starting at $0.1 / 1M tokens in / $0.5 / 1M tokens out per 1M tokens. Capabilities: streaming, tool, json.
Tabla comparativa
Usa esta vista para reducir una lista de produccion, construir una politica de respaldo o comparar la economia de los modelos.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 4 Argongoogle/gemini-4-argon | $2 / 1M tokens | $10 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 2974-10589ms | Catalog | Platform curated | |
| Claude Haiku 5.5anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 | Anthropic | Starting at $0.1 / 1M tokens | $0.5 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1321-2017ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5 | Anthropic | $2 / 1M tokens | $10 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1230-2392ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| GPT‑6 Lunaopenai/gpt-6-luna | OpenAI | Starting at $0.1 / 1M tokens | $0.5 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1722-2681ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| GPT‑6 Solopenai/gpt-6-sol | OpenAI | Starting at $2 / 1M tokens | $10 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1752-3715ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Claude Opus 5.5anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 | Anthropic | $4 / 1M tokens | $20 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1845-5119ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| GPT-6 Astraopenai/gpt-6-astra | OpenAI | Starting at $10 / 1M tokens | $50 / 1M tokens | 1.1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 2408-7945ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Claude Fable 5.1anthropic/claude-fable-5.1 | Anthropic | $10 / 1M tokens | $50 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 3187-5152ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Tool calling, structured JSON, enough context for the task, and instructions that stick. Everything else is secondary.
They generate long traces: planning text, tool results stuffed back into context, and retries. Cap steps and log token use per run.
No. Route planning or simple tool picks to cheaper models when quality allows, and reserve stronger models for hard steps.
Rankings