Compare Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic) and Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Side by side
Compare price, provider, context, capabilities, latency, and source basis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7anthropic/claude-opus-4.7 | Anthropic | $5 / 1M tokens | $25 / 1M tokens | 1M | Tool callingJSON modeLong contextReasoning | frontier reasoning, large codebase review | 2300-6800ms | Catalog | OpenRouter if available |
| Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5 | Anthropic | $3 / 1M tokens | $15 / 1M tokens | 1M | Tool callingJSON modeLong contextReasoning | coding agents, code review | 1600-4800ms | Catalog | OpenRouter if available |
FAQ
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 is cheaper ($3 / 1M tokens input / $15 / 1M tokens output) vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 ($5 / 1M tokens input / $25 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Both offer the same context window: 1M tokens.
Both target High quality. Pick Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 to optimize cost, or Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.