Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-5

Compare Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) and GLM-5 (Z Ai) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.

Estimate costAll comparisons

Which should you pick?

  • Price: GLM-5 is cheaper ($0.58 / 1M tokens input / $2.58 / 1M tokens output) vs Claude Opus 4.6 ($5 / 1M tokens input / $25 / 1M tokens output).
  • Context: Claude Opus 4.6 has the larger context window (1M tokens).
  • Claude Opus 4.6 adds: Vision.

Side by side

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-5 — full comparison

Compare price, provider, context, capabilities, latency, and source basis.

ModelProviderInputOutputContextCapabilitiesBest forLatencyStatusSource
Claude Opus 4.6anthropic/claude-opus-4.6Anthropic$5 / 1M tokens$25 / 1M tokens1M
StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision
image understanding, multimodal chat1930-4195msCatalogPlatform curated
GLM-5z-ai/glm-5Z AiStarting at $0.58 / 1M tokens$2.58 / 1M tokens198k
StreamingTool callingJSON modeLong context
General chat via Z Ai, API workloads1431-2367msCatalogPlatform curated

FAQ

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-5 FAQ

Is Claude Opus 4.6 or GLM-5 cheaper?

GLM-5 is cheaper ($0.58 / 1M tokens input / $2.58 / 1M tokens output) vs Claude Opus 4.6 ($5 / 1M tokens input / $25 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.6 or GLM-5?

Claude Opus 4.6 is larger (1M tokens) vs 198k tokens.

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-5 for Long context: which should I pick?

Both target Long context. Pick GLM-5 to optimize cost, or Claude Opus 4.6 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.

Claude Opus 4.6 detailsGLM-5 detailsPricing calculatorOpenAI-compatible quickstart

Related comparisons

Compare other models

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-6 AstraClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-6.1 SolClaude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 4.6Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6