Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) and Vidu-Q3-pro-CN (Vidu) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Side by side
Compare price, provider, context, capabilities, latency, and source basis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 | Anthropic | $1 / 1M tokens | $5 / 1M tokens | 200k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1327-2183ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Vidu-Q3-pro-CNvidu/viduq3-pro-cn | Vidu | $0.11 / s | — | — | StreamingVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 0-0ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Vidu-Q3-pro-CN is cheaper ($0.11 / s per second) vs Claude Haiku 4.5 ($1 / 1M tokens input / $5 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Claude Haiku 4.5 is larger (200k tokens) vs — tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick Vidu-Q3-pro-CN to optimize cost, or Claude Haiku 4.5 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.
Related comparisons