Compare OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (OpenAI) and OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra (OpenAI) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Side by side
Compare price, provider, context, capabilities, latency, and source basis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Lunaopenai/gpt-5.6-luna | OpenAI | $0.029 / 1M tokens | $0.174 / 1M tokens | 1.1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terraopenai/gpt-5.6-terra | OpenAI | $0.289 / 1M tokens | $1.74 / 1M tokens | 1.1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper ($0.029 / 1M tokens input / $0.174 / 1M tokens output) vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra ($0.289 / 1M tokens input / $1.74 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Both offer the same context window: 1.1M tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna to optimize cost, or OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.
Related comparisons