Compare Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (Google) and Kimi-K2.5 (Moonshotai) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Side by side
Compare price, provider, context, capabilities, latency, and source basis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Previewgoogle/gemini-3.1-pro-preview | Starting at $2 / 1M tokens | $12 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 2140-4141ms | Catalog | Platform curated | |
| Kimi-K2.5moonshotai/kimi-k2.5 | Moonshotai | $0.58 / 1M tokens | $3.02 / 1M tokens | 256k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1057-1836ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Kimi-K2.5 is cheaper ($0.58 / 1M tokens input / $3.02 / 1M tokens output) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ($2 / 1M tokens input / $12 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is larger (1M tokens) vs 256k tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick Kimi-K2.5 to optimize cost, or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.