Compare Deepseek-V4-Pro-0813 (DeepSeek) and Grok 4.6 (X Ai) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Side by side
Compare price, provider, context, capabilities, latency, and source basis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deepseek-V4-Pro-0813deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813 | DeepSeek | $1.33 / 1M tokens | $3.98 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeLong context | Chinese Q&A, general chat | 2087-21162ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Grok 4.6x-ai/grok-4.6 | X Ai | Starting at $2 / 1M tokens | $6 / 1M tokens | 500k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 0-0ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Deepseek-V4-Pro-0813 is cheaper ($1.33 / 1M tokens input / $3.98 / 1M tokens output) vs Grok 4.6 ($2 / 1M tokens input / $6 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Deepseek-V4-Pro-0813 is larger (1M tokens) vs 500k tokens.
Both target Long context. Pick Deepseek-V4-Pro-0813 to optimize cost, or Deepseek-V4-Pro-0813 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.