Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) and GLM-5.2 (Z Ai) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Side by side
Compare price, provider, context, capabilities, latency, and source basis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 | Anthropic | $1 / 1M tokens | $5 / 1M tokens | 200k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1166-3573ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| GLM-5.2z-ai/glm-5.2 | Z Ai | $1.18 / 1M tokens | $4.12 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeLong context | General chat via Z Ai, API workloads | 1103-2070ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
GLM-5.2 is cheaper ($1.18 / 1M tokens input / $4.12 / 1M tokens output) vs Claude Haiku 4.5 ($1 / 1M tokens input / $5 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
GLM-5.2 is larger (1M tokens) vs 200k tokens.
Both target Long context. Pick GLM-5.2 to optimize cost, or GLM-5.2 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.