Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-6.1 Sol cheaper?
Their total cost is roughly equal: $2 / 1M tokens input / $10 / 1M tokens output.
Compare Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic) and GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Side by side
Compare price, provider, context, capabilities, latency, and source basis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5 | Anthropic | $2 / 1M tokens | $10 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1230-2392ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| GPT-6.1 Solopenai/gpt-6.1-sol | OpenAI | Starting at $2 / 1M tokens | $10 / 1M tokens | 1.1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 2489-8238ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Their total cost is roughly equal: $2 / 1M tokens input / $10 / 1M tokens output.
GPT-6.1 Sol is larger (1.1M tokens) vs 1M tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 to optimize cost, or GPT-6.1 Sol for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.
Related comparisons