Compare Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) and Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1 (Anthropic) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Side by side
Compare price, provider, context, capabilities, latency, and source basis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 | Anthropic | $0.145 / 1M tokens | $0.723 / 1M tokens | 200k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1anthropic/claude-opus-4.1 | Anthropic | $2.82 / 1M tokens | $14.11 / 1M tokens | 200k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper ($0.145 / 1M tokens input / $0.723 / 1M tokens output) vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.1 ($2.82 / 1M tokens input / $14.11 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Both offer the same context window: 200k tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 to optimize cost, or Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.