Compare Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 (OpenRouter) and Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest (OpenRouter) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Side by side
Compare price, provider, context, capabilities, latency, and source basis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5mistralai/mistral-medium-3-5 | OpenRouter | $0.282 / 1M tokens | $1.41 / 1M tokens | 262.1k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest~anthropic/claude-haiku-latest | OpenRouter | $0.188 / 1M tokens | $0.94 / 1M tokens | 200k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest is cheaper ($0.188 / 1M tokens input / $0.94 / 1M tokens output) vs Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 ($0.282 / 1M tokens input / $1.41 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 is larger (262.1k tokens) vs 200k tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest to optimize cost, or Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.