Compare DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (DeepSeek) and Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (Google) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Side by side
Compare price, provider, context, capabilities, latency, and source basis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813 | DeepSeek | $1.33 / 1M tokens | $3.98 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeLong context | Chinese Q&A, general chat | 0-0ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Litegoogle/gemini-3.5-flash-lite | $0.3 / 1M tokens | $2.50 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 973-1444ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper ($0.3 / 1M tokens input / $2.50 / 1M tokens output) vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 ($1.33 / 1M tokens input / $3.98 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Both offer the same context window: 1M tokens.
Both target Long context. Pick Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite to optimize cost, or DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.