Compare Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) and Gemini 3 Pro Image (Nano Banana Pro) (Gemini) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Side by side
Compare price, provider, context, capabilities, latency, and source basis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.5anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5 | Anthropic | $3 / 1M tokens | $15 / 1M tokens | 200k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1904-2753ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Gemini 3 Pro Image (Nano Banana Pro) gemini/gemini-3-pro-image | Gemini | $0.314 / image | — | — | StreamingVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 0-0ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Gemini 3 Pro Image (Nano Banana Pro) is cheaper ($0.314 / image per image) vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 ($3 / 1M tokens input / $15 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is larger (200k tokens) vs — tokens.
Both target Vision. Pick Gemini 3 Pro Image (Nano Banana Pro) to optimize cost, or Claude Sonnet 4.5 for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.