Compare AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 (OpenRouter) and Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest (OpenRouter) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Side by side
Compare price, provider, context, capabilities, latency, and source basis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI21: Jamba Large 1.7ai21/jamba-large-1.7 | OpenRouter | $0.376 / 1M tokens | $1.50 / 1M tokens | 256k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeLong context | General chat via OpenRouter, API workloads | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest~anthropic/claude-opus-latest | OpenRouter | $0.94 / 1M tokens | $4.70 / 1M tokens | 1M | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 is cheaper ($0.376 / 1M tokens input / $1.50 / 1M tokens output) vs Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest ($0.94 / 1M tokens input / $4.70 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest is larger (1M tokens) vs 256k tokens.
Both target Long context. Pick AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 to optimize cost, or Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.