Compare Tencent: Hy3 preview (OpenRouter) and Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest (OpenRouter) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Seite an Seite
Vergleichen Sie Preis, Anbieter, Kontext, Fahigkeiten, Latenz und Quellenbasis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tencent: Hy3 previewtencent/hy3-preview | OpenRouter | $0.013 / 1M tokens | $0.041 / 1M tokens | 262.1k | StreamingTool callingLong context | General chat via OpenRouter, API workloads | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest~anthropic/claude-haiku-latest | OpenRouter | $0.188 / 1M tokens | $0.94 / 1M tokens | 200k | StreamingTool callingJSON modeVision | image understanding, multimodal chat | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Tencent: Hy3 preview is cheaper ($0.013 / 1M tokens input / $0.041 / 1M tokens output) vs Anthropic Claude Haiku Latest ($0.188 / 1M tokens input / $0.94 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Tencent: Hy3 preview is larger (262.1k tokens) vs 200k tokens.
Both target Long context. Pick Tencent: Hy3 preview to optimize cost, or Tencent: Hy3 preview for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.