Compare Text Embedding 3 Large (OpenAI) and Text Embedding 3 Small (OpenAI) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Seite an Seite
Vergleichen Sie Preis, Anbieter, Kontext, Fahigkeiten, Latenz und Quellenbasis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Text Embedding 3 Largeopenai/text-embedding-3-large | OpenAI | $0.13 / 1M tokens | $0 / 1M tokens | — | Streaming | General chat via OpenAI, API workloads | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
| Text Embedding 3 Smallopenai/text-embedding-3-small | OpenAI | $0.02 / 1M tokens | $0 / 1M tokens | — | Streaming | General chat via OpenAI, API workloads | 1000-3000ms | Catalog | Platform curated |
FAQ
Text Embedding 3 Small is cheaper ($0.02 / 1M tokens input / $0 / 1M tokens output) vs Text Embedding 3 Large ($0.13 / 1M tokens input / $0 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Both offer the same context window: — tokens.
Both target High quality. Pick Text Embedding 3 Small to optimize cost, or Text Embedding 3 Large for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.